IPO Insights

IPO or RTO? A framework for Uzbek founders

Sukhrobjon (Rob) Ismoilov
Sukhrobjon (Rob) Ismoilov
Founder & Principal · Main Street Wealth

A decision framework for founders weighing a traditional US IPO against a reverse takeover — timing, cost, ownership retention, and institutional bid.

Last updated
February 2026
384 views · 10 min read
Share

When a traditional IPO wins

A traditional IPO delivers the deepest institutional bid, the strongest valuation for growth stories, and the most durable public currency. It is the right choice when the company has the scale, the story, and the runway to run a 12–18 month process.

When an RTO wins

An RTO — reverse merger with a listed shell — gets a company public in 3–4 months, preserves 80–90% of founder ownership, and can raise $50–150M+ into the public entity. It is the right choice when speed, ownership retention, and capital-market access all matter more than day-one valuation.

A quick decision framework

  • Is the company at institutional scale ($75–100M+ revenue)? Traditional IPO often wins.
  • Is speed and ownership retention paramount? RTO often wins.
  • Is the market cold? RTO often wins on execution certainty.
  • Is the story a category leader with clean financials? Traditional IPO often wins on valuation.

Full write-up in preparation

Executive summary and highlights below. Full report available on request under NDA.

Subscribe to our briefings

Quarterly briefings on Uzbekistan, Central Asia, and cross-border capital markets.